The Limitations of Current Decision-Making Techniques in the Procurement of COTS Software Components
نویسندگان
چکیده
The fundamentals of good decision-making are, first, a clear understanding of the decision itself and second the availability of properly focused information to support the decision. Decision-making techniques help with both these problems. However, the techniques should be thought of as aids to decision-making and not the substitutes for it. Numerous decision-making techniques have been proposed as effective methods of ranking software products for selection for use as components in large-scale systems. Many of these techniques have been developed and successfully applied in other arenas and have been either used directly or adapted to be applied to COTS product evaluation and selection. This paper will show that many of these techniques are not valid when applied in this manner. We will describe an alternate requirements-driven technique that could be more effective.
منابع مشابه
COTS Software Selection: The Need to make Tradeoffs between System Requirements, Architectures and COTS/Components
This short paper presents a new research agenda to address problems of COTS software selection in the forthcoming decade. It describes the increasing shift towards software engineering based on COTS software packages, the limitations of current COTS/component-based software engineering methods and research efforts, and proposes a new research agenda to address the problems which arise from a so...
متن کاملDecision Model for COTS Component Procurement Based on Case-based Retrieval and Goal Programming
Compared with traditional information system development methodology, COTS-based information system has the following advantages: Avoid expensive development and maintenance; frequent upgrades often anticipate organization’s need; rich functionality; mature technologies; tracks technology trends, etc. However, how to select appropriate COTS components is a complex problem. For improving the acc...
متن کاملPrioritization and Investigation of the Direction of Influence and Suscep-tibility of Components of "Information Literacy Skills" Based on Tech-niques of "Multi-criteria Decision-making" and "Paired Comparisons"
Purpose: The study aims to weight, determine the priority, and investigate the direction of influencing and susceptibility of the components of "information literacy skills" by considering the importance of the information context of the community in training these skills in order to eliminate their gaps and promote the "information literacy skills" of the community. Methodology: This is an app...
متن کاملارایه روشی برای ارزیابی ریسکهای بهداشتی، ایمنی و محیط زیست (HSE) با استفاده از روشهای تصمیمگیری چندمعیاره (MCDM) (مطالعه موردی: ساخت نیروگاه)
Introduction: Nowadays, using multi attribute decision making (MADM) techniques in HSE hazard rating have been widely increased. On the other hand, Analytical Network process (ANP) methods has a high flexibility and accuracy in decision ranking. Therefore, the combination of the two mentioned approaches can provide a more precise prioritization for HSE hazards. Using ANP techniques, in this res...
متن کاملA symbol-based fuzzy decision-making approach to evaluate the user satisfaction on services in academic digital libraries
Academic libraries play a significant role in providing core services that include research, teaching and learning. Usersatisfaction is an important indicator for evaluating the performance of library service. This paper develops a methodfor measuring the user satisfaction in a group decision-making environment. First, the performance of service isevaluated by using questionnaire survey. The sc...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002